Archive

Pittsburgh man gets more than 7 years for gun charge | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh man gets more than 7 years for gun charge

233233webgun3

A Pittsburgh man was ordered to serve 7 1/2 years in prison for violating federal gun laws.

Marcus Smith, 23, was sentenced Friday in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh.

United States District Judge Mark R. Hornak imposed the sentence.

Prosecutors said Smith had four prior convictions in Allegheny County Court.

According to federal court records, he was convicted of drug delivery and resisting arrest in 2013; aggravated assault and nine counts of reckless endangerment in 2014; having a handgun and resisting arrest in 2015; trespass, reckless endangerment and simple assault also in 2015.

As a result, he was no longer allowed to have firearms or ammunition. Despite those convictions, on Feb. 2, 2017, Smith again had a 9mm pistol loaded with an extended magazine, prosecutors said. Federal prosecution provided for a stiffer sentence.

He was still on state probation at the time.

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Neighborhoods.

U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady commended the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police for the investigation.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.