Pittsburgh poised to allow companies using drones to film in parks |

Pittsburgh poised to allow companies using drones to film in parks

A Phantom 3 drone during a test flight at the West Mifflin Area High School in December 2015.

Filmmakers would be permitted to use drones for shooting scenes and photographs over Pittsburgh-owned property, including parks, under legislation City Council is considering.

Council on Wednesday unanimously approved the bill during a preliminary vote. A final vote is expected Tuesday.

“We’re just trying to, shall we say, allow the movie industry, the television industry, to use drones within the city parks and to have a mechanism where we’re aware of it and that we can monitor it, make sure the operators are appropriately licensed and that they’re not doing anything that would be dangerous to public safety,” Public Safety Director Wendell Hissrich said during a council meeting.

Council in 2015 banned the use of drones in parks, describing them as a nuisance and threat to public safety.

The Federal Aviation Administration has struggled to regulate drones as popularity across the United States has increased their usage in recent years. The agency limits them to below 400 feet and at least five miles from airports.

Under the bill, commercial drone operators would have to obtain a film permit from the city, have an FAA-approved license and insurance.

Brian Katze, Pittsburgh’s special events manager, said the city has not yet determined how much a permit would cost.

“Production companies would apply to the city as they do now for feature films, TV shows, commercials, and if they request to use a drone right now there’s processes in place to get it approved. But if it was requested for a park space, it’s currently banned by code,” Katze said. “What this amendment does is allows us to look at it, even if it was a request for a park, to put the controls on it to allow it inside the one place it’s actually banned right now.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.