Pittsburgh police arrest domestic violence suspect who sparked weekend standoff |

Pittsburgh police arrest domestic violence suspect who sparked weekend standoff

Megan Guza

Editor’s note: All charges against Peter Stepanovich relating to this incident were withdrawn Nov. 20, 2018, during a preliminary hearing in front of Magisterial District Judge James Hanley Jr.

Pittsburgh police on Tuesday arrested a domestic violence suspect who prompted an hours-long standoff over the weekend, authorities said.

The incident began about 4:45 p.m. Sunday when police responded to a home on Chelton Avenue in Pittsburgh’s Brookline neighborhood for a report of a domestic violence incident, according to Public Safety spokeswoman Alicia George.

Police arrived and found a woman with visible injuries, and officers surrounded the home, believing the man inside – later identified as Peter Stepanovich – was armed, George said.

Stepanovich refused to come out and at some point fled the scene, police said. SWAT officers responded but did not find Stepanovich.

George said Stepanovich was later found at a local hospital, and he was taken into custody about 3:15 a.m. Tuesday as he was discharged.

Stepanovich, 28, is charged with aggravated assault, unlawful restraint and recklessly endangering another person.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.