Pittsburgh pulls in $197K a year selling used vehicles, equipment |

Pittsburgh pulls in $197K a year selling used vehicles, equipment

City of Pittsburgh garbage men collect refuse along Lamont Place, an alleyway in Shadyside Wednesday August 31, 2005.
A Pittsburgh Police car crosses the Clemente Bridge, Monday, August 4th, 2003.
This 1997 Ford, City of Pittsburgh ambulance sits for a break job in the Pittsburgh Municipal Garage in the Strip District Thursday August 15, 2001.

Pittsburgh is pulling in cash by the truckload through online auctions of used city vehicles and equipment, the Mayor’s Office said Friday.

The city has received $771,971 since starting the auctions through the company GovDeals in November 2014. The biggest sellers are used garbage trucks, which have generated $170,662 in total sales, followed by police vehicles, totaling $147,818.

“GovDeals has proven to be a useful tool and allows for a fairly simple process to dispose of a wide variety of unused items, from art supplies to old fire trucks,” city budget Director Jennifer Presutti said.

It has a 2014 Ford Explorer police vehicle, 2007 Chevrolet ambulance and a 2008 Harley-Davidson police motorcycle posted for sale on the auction website .

Former City Councilman Dan Gilman, now Mayor Bill Peduto’s chief of staff, sponsored legislation in 2014 that created the online auction. Gilman said at the time that the city was losing out on “tens if not hundreds of thousands” each year in potential sales.

The auction has so far averaged $197,276 in sales each year, according to the Mayor’s Office.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.