ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh’s Union Trust Building honored for its restoration |

Pittsburgh’s Union Trust Building honored for its restoration

Theresa Clift
| Wednesday, July 11, 2018 1:09 p.m
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
A Boston developer bought the Union Trust Building for $14 million at a sheriff's sale in 2014. The building is at the corner of Fifth Avenue and Grant Street, Downtown.
Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review
Chris Lasky gives a tour of the Union Trust Building on Wednesday, July 13, 2016. Boston-based The Davis Companies spent more than $100 million renovating Downtown Pittsburgh landmark.It was built 100 years ago by industrialist Henry Clay Frick. (Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review)
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
A Boston developer bought the Union Trust Building for $14 million at a sheriff's sale in 2014.

The Union Trust Building in Downtown Pittsburgh was awarded a 2018 American Architecture Award for building restoration.

The building at Grant Street and Fifth Avenue is one of only three buildings in the country this year to receive the prestigious award, given by the Chicago Athenaeum Museum of Architecture and Design, a news release said.

St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City and Unity Temple in Oak Park, Ill., were also awarded.

The Davis Companies, a Boston-based developer, bought the building for $14 million at a sheriff’s sale in 2014. The developer spent $100 million renovating the historic building.

The Union Trust Building is more than a century old and was originally commissioned by Henry Frick. It was designed by Frederick John Osterling.

Mayor Bill Peduto in 2016 signed a bill to divert up to $5.7 million in parking tax revenue to help preserve the Union Trust Building.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Theresa at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.