Archive

ShareThis Page
Plum substitute teacher accused of inappropriate behavior in 2016 | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Plum substitute teacher accused of inappropriate behavior in 2016

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, September 5, 2018 9:12 p.m
201117ThonIIILouisW
201117plumhighschool

A long-term substitute teacher at Plum High School is banned from district property after he was charged with statutory sexual assault and unlawful contact with a minor.

Plum police filed charges against Louis Thon III, 25, of Pittsburgh on Aug. 23. The charges stem from an incident Feb. 5, 2016, according to online court documents.

The district released a statement Wednesday, but did not specify the alleged behavior.

An administrator received a call March 26 from a parent alleging inappropriate behavior by a Kelly Educational Staffing employee working as a substitute for the district, according to the statement.

The administrator notified ChildLine and the police department, followed state laws and district policies and procedures and reported the information. The employee was immediately escorted off campus and barred from district property, the statement read.

On Aug. 29, the district obtained a copy of an arrest report, which indicated the alleged incident took place in 2016, prior to the substitute’s work in the district.

Thon’s preliminary hearing is set for Sept. 12 before Plum District Judge Linda Zucco.

“We have, and will continue to fully cooperate with law enforcement as they work to bring to justice any person who chooses to do harm to children,” the statement read.

Plum school board President Steve Schlauch said the district will have no further comment.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, mdivittorio@tribweb.com or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.