ShareThis Page
Port Authority of Allegheny County would slash routes under budget proposal |

Port Authority of Allegheny County would slash routes under budget proposal

Theresa Clift
| Monday, September 11, 2017 3:18 p.m
Tribune-Review file
A Port Authority bus comes down West Eighth Avenue in West Homestead to turn onto Forest Avenue.

The Port Authority of Allegheny County would be forced to cut half its bus routes, along with evening and weekend service, under a new state budget proposal.

The proposal, aimed to help balance the state budget, would cut $80 million of the authority’s operating funds — about 35 percent of its annual state funding and 19 percent of the authority’s entire projected revenue for 2018, according to an authority news release.

“This proposal is harmful to our residents and would be devastating to our strong and growing economy,” said Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald in the release.

The cuts would be part of the $357 million that would be eliminated from transit agencies statewide — a plan Gov. Tom Wolf opposes.

“Shifting money from public and multimodal transportation sets back progress in municipalities small and large across Pennsylvania,” J.J. Abbott, a Wolf spokesman, said in a statement. “These funds support essential commonwealth programs. If the money is not there, every Pennsylvanian will be negatively impacted.”

The proposal would also take funds from 911 centers and volunteer firefighters, according to Abbott.

Port Authority Interim CEO David Donahoe on Friday sent a letter to state legislators in Allegheny County outlining the devastating effects it would have on the authority.

“We are contacting you on behalf of our 62 million annual riders to express alarm with a proposal that would not only devastate the Port Authority system but undermine the stable, predictable funding pact made between the state and local transit agencies just four years ago with the passage of Act 89,” Donahoe wrote.

In 2011-12, the authority faced a $35 million deficit, which prompting it to eliminate 29 routes, lay off 200 employees, close one bus operating division and reduce the frequency of remaining service, Donahoe wrote.

That deficit was less than half of the $80 million loss the authority now faces.

If the state budget proposal passed, the authority — in addition to cutting half its routes and weekend/evening service — would likely close two of five operating divisions, decrease paratransit support for disabled and elderly and impose a substantial fare increase, Donahoe wrote.

Plans underway to expand service, improve on-time performance and advance a series of capital projects would all be delayed or canceled.

State legislators are set to consider the proposal later this week as part of the budget vote.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter @tclift.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Theresa at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.