ShareThis Page
Prosecutors seek gag order in Michael Rosfeld trial |

Prosecutors seek gag order in Michael Rosfeld trial

Patrick Thomassey, defense attorney for East Pittsburgh officer Michael Rosfeld, addresses the media Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2018, following a pre-trial conference in the homicide case against Rosfeld. Prosecutors have requested a gag order in the case because of comments Thomassey made after the hearing.

Prosecutors in the Antwon Rose II homicide case want to silence attorneys and witnesses from talking to the media in the months leading up to the trial.

Chief Trial Deputy District Attorney Daniel Fitzsimmons last week filed a motion seeking to place a gag order on all involved in the case.

Rosfeld, an East Pittsburgh police officer, faces one charge of homicide in the June 19 death of 17-year-old Rose, who was shot and killed as he ran, unarmed, from a felony traffic stop.

The filing came one day after a pre-trial conference hearing before Common Pleas Judge Anthony Mariani after which Patrick Thomassey, Rosfeld’s attorney, addressed the media.

“At various times … counsel for the defendant has made extrajudicial statements to members of the print, radio and television media that would tend to prejudice the trial process …” Fitzsimmons wrote in the motion.

Chief among the statements were those in which Thomassey alleged that prosecutors were “trying to hide something.”

The prosecution’s motion called the statements ironic, as Thomassey had shortly before announced his intention to file for a change of venire – to bring in an outside jury – “based upon the claim that media coverage has prejudiced the trial process.”

The gag order would apply to attorneys on both sides of the case, witnesses and anyone “assisting or associated with” the trial.

A hearing on the motion is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. Wednesday.

Rose was a passenger in a car suspected in a drive-by shooting minutes earlier on June 19 in nearby North Braddock. Police say the car had gunshot damage to its rear window, likely from the earlier shooting. As Rosfeld ordered the jitney driver to the ground, Rose and backseat passenger Zaijuan Hester fled on foot, authorities said.

Rosfeld fired, hitting Rose three times. District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. has said Hester was the shooter in the earlier drive-by shooting, and a grand jury indicted him last month on charges of attempted homicide and aggravated assault.

Thomassey last week indicated he plans to ask that Hester be granted immunity in exchange for testimony.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.