Archive

ShareThis Page
PWSA approves $158 million in improvements | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

PWSA approves $158 million in improvements

Tribune-Review
| Friday, September 28, 2018 6:03 p.m
283851PWSAplant

The Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority board of directors Friday unanimously approved a $158 million capital improvement plan for 2019 that would be funded through a $150 million bond issue.

The capital budget and bond issue are subject to approval by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Officials said the money would be used for infrastructure upgrades and repairs that have been needed for decades.

PWSA Executive Director Robert Weimar said projects include updates to the Aspinwall water plant, a new three-mile water main from the plant to the Lanpher Reservoir in Shaler, repairs to storage tanks, new main valves, water meters and other urgent needs.

“We’ve not had enough money to do all this, so oftentimes we had critical things that were left off the list,” Weimar said. “Now we’re going back to that critical list and we’re going to do those this year. Some of them date back to 2007 that they were known to be in tough condition and needed to be repaired. Our (thrust) in this next year is going to be catch up… on projects that should have been done years ago.”

Weimar said the budget includes money for sewer repairs and green infrastructure projects, designed to reduce the amount of storm water flowing into streams and rivers during heavy rainfall.

PWSA has been plagued for years with aging pipes, some dating to the 1800s, along with chronic water main breaks, inaccurate meter readings and other breakdowns that have lead to boil water orders and violations issued by the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Weimar said the improvements are designed to last from 25 to 100 years.

The authority since 2015 has ramped up spending on capital projects.

Weimar said PWSA’s spending on capital improvements totaled $20 million in 2015, $40 million in 2016, $52 million in 2017 and is on track to be $70 million this year.

“Much of the work that we’re doing now is work that should have been done five, to 10, to 20, to 30 years ago,” he said. “It’s stuff that’s no-nonsense. You have to do it, and we’re not spending money on expanding or changing the system. We’re spending money on making the system work without any failures.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.