Raccoons in Pittsburgh, Mt. Lebanon test positive for rabies |

Raccoons in Pittsburgh, Mt. Lebanon test positive for rabies


Two raccoons in Pittsburgh and Mt. Lebanon have tested positive for rabies, Allegheny County Health Department officials said Tuesday.

The first raccoon was found near Duffield Street on the border between Pittsburgh’s Morningside and Stanton Heights neighborhoods, department director Dr. Karen Hacker said in a release.

The second raccoon was found on Racine Avenue in Mt. Lebanon, officials said.

The raccoons bring the year’s rabid animal total to 19 across the county, Hacker said. In all, officials have detected rabies in eight raccoons, seven bats, two cats, a groundhog and a fox.

A feral cat found in North Versailles last month tested positive for the disease, less than two weeks after a rabid fox was found in the area.

A groundhog killed by a dog in Mt. Lebanon earlier this summer also tested positive for the virus, which is generally transmitted through a bite or scratch. Untreated, the virus is often fatal.

In August, the county health department distributed rabies vaccine baits for raccoons across the county, focusing on wooded areas and parks. Made of fishmeal and fish oil, the bait attracts raccoons and has a packet of rabies vaccine in the middle.

The health department urged people to stay away from stray and wild animals, even if they appear healthy. Animals acting strange or appearing sick should be reported to animal control, the state game commission or the police.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.