Archive

ShareThis Page
Report: Pittsburgh drivers among worst in nation | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Report: Pittsburgh drivers among worst in nation

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, September 4, 2018 2:39 p.m.
195793PghDrivers
Pittsburgh drivers aren’t the worst, but they’re pretty close — ranking 171st out of 200 U.S. cites in a new report by Allstate.

Yinz can’t drive very well.

At least that’s what Allstate’s latest report on America’s Best Drivers says.

Out of 200 U.S. cities, Pittsburgh ranked 171st — four spots better than last year. (So, at least there’s improvement, right?)

Among the factors considered by Allstate in their ranking was average years between claims. The national average is 10 years, with Pittsburghers filing claims about every 6.8 years. Way to go, jagoffs.

When it comes to hard-braking events, Pittsburghers have 23.8 incidents every 1,000 miles; the national average there is 19.

According to Allstate’s reports, Pittsburgh drivers have been improving — their low-point was in 2014 when they ranked 187. Their best year: In 2008, they ranked 124.

The folks in the suburbs are better, they file claims every 10.1 years, and have 18.6 hard-braking incidents every 1,000 miles.

If you can believe it, drivers in Cleveland are far better than Pittsburghers, ranking 90th in the nation. Other cities of note include Akron (35th), New York City (107th), Philadelphia (191th), and Los Angeles (194th).

As for the best drivers in the country, they’re in Brownsville, Texas. They file a claim every 13.6 years. The second-best city is Kansas City, followed by Boise, Huntsville, Ala., and Madison, Wisc.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at 724-226-4697, cpastrick@tribweb.com or via Twitter @CPastrickTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.