ShareThis Page
Retiree testifies he saw defendants loitering in alley prior to Elliott murder |

Retiree testifies he saw defendants loitering in alley prior to Elliott murder

| Wednesday, September 14, 2016 4:57 p.m

A retiree sitting at his attic window watched two men loiter around a car and an alley for nearly an hour, then saw them run away shortly after a home invasion and deadly shooting on the next street, he said in court Wednesday.

Testifying at the trial of Derek Lee and Paul Durham in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, Henry Leacock said he called 911 Oct. 14, 2014 to describe the two men, who he said were going in and out of Navajo Way for more than 45 minutes before they walked in the alley and disappeared. He later saw them “running like the dickens” in the alley to their car and driving off. He later learned there had been a murder on nearby Lakewood Street.

Police would later link the license plate and car description Leacock gave to a rental car in Lee’s name, and Leacock chose Lee’s photo out of a lineup as one of the men at the alley. Prosecutors said Lee and Durham invaded the Lakewood Street home of Leonard Butler and Tina Chapple and held them hostage in the basement and that Durham shot and killed Butler, 44, when Butler lunged at him.

Testimony was scheduled to continue Thursday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.