Rothfus letter to 499 constituents ducks federal law on mass mailers by 1 |

Rothfus letter to 499 constituents ducks federal law on mass mailers by 1

Wesley Venteicher
In this May 1, 2018 file photo Republican Rep. Keith Rothfus sits outside a coffee shop in downtown Beaver, Pa. A congressman since 2013, Rothfus faces a tough re-election battle in Pennsylvania’s newly created 17th District against Democrat Conor Lamb, who won a special election House victory earlier this year. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar, File)

Technically, it’s not a mass mailer.

So the letter Rep. Keith Rothfus, R-Sewickley, sent to 499 constituents last week isn’t subject to a federal law that prohibits him from sending official mail to 500 people or more within 90 days of an election.

But it did raise concerns when shared with Washington, D.C.-based nonpartisan political reform group Issue One.

“If you’re trying to get around the rules by playing with the technical number, we still think that’s activity that members of Congress should avoid,” said Tyler Cole, the group’s legislative director. “It’s not a good use of taxpayer money, and it’s a little unseemly.”

Sent in an envelope marked “official business,” the letter introduced itself as “an update on the actions we have taken in Congress to create well-paying jobs,” and went on to discuss Rothfus’ support for repealing a medical device tax and blocking a tax on high-cost health insurance. The letter was dated Sept. 11.

Rothfus, 56, a former attorney, is pursuing a fourth term in the Nov. 6 election.

“This particular communication is not a mass mailer, and was sent in compliance with the House rules regarding communication with constituents of Pennsylvania’s Twelfth Congressional District,” Rothfus spokeswoman Anna Fronzaglia said in an emailed statement.

Rothfus represents the 12th Congressional District. He is running for re-election in the newly drawn 17th Congressional District. Parts of the 12th and 17th districts overlap, meaning some constituents in Rothfus’ current district will see him on the ballot in his new district. The overlapping portion covers parts of Beaver County and Allegheny County.

Had it been sent to 500 people or more, the letter by law would have had to include a statement saying that it was paid for with taxpayer dollars. The letter doesn’t say that, and Fronzaglia didn’t respond to a question about how much the letter cost to mail out.

“Oftentimes, the act of being an elected official is very much linked to the campaign you’re going to run. They’re going to get a certain benefit from that,” Cole said. “I think that’s different from trying to exploit the rules by trying to gain some electoral advantage by making sure you’re just at the point of making sure you’re not across the line. You would hope members of Congress would really want to abide by the spirit of the laws.”

Rothfus faces Rep. Conor Lamb, D-Mt. Lebanon, in the 17th District race. Lamb, 34, a former federal prosecutor, won a special election in March to replace former Republican Rep. Tim Murphy in the 18th Congressional District.

Members of Congress have been allowed to send mail to their constituents without paying for postage since 1775. It is known as the franking privilege and considered an advantage for incumbent candidates. A 1997 law created the restriction on sending mass mailers within 90 days of an election.

Lamb held a double-digit lead over Rothfus in a July Monmouth University poll of the race. Both candidates had about $2 million in campaign coffers at the end of June, the last reported totals.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Wes at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.