ShareThis Page
Salvation Army site on boulevard could become hotel |

Salvation Army site on boulevard could become hotel

Sam Spatter
| Monday, March 24, 2014 11:44 p.m

Downtown could get another hotel.

Greenway Realty Holdings of New Jersey has purchased the Salvation Army building on the Boulevard of Allies and is considering turning it into a 125- to 130-room boutique hotel, according to Boutique Hotel News, a trade publication.

Scott Schroeder and his partner, Victor Alfonso, said they “literally stumbled” across the property last spring while in Pittsburgh investigating a separate hotel deal. Schroeder said the property has the potential to be turned around and brought back to life.

Greenway, under Four 424 Third Avenue Pittsburgh LLC, paid the Salvation Army $2.16 million for the building and nearly $800,000 for an adjoining parking lot. The building was built as a hotel for young women in 1924, and includes a chapel, swimming pool, basketball court and theater.

The Salvation Army vacated the building several years ago and moved to the Carnegie Business Park in Carnegie.

Four Downtown hotels are under development: the Hotel Monaco in the former Reed Smith Building; a Drury Inn and Suites in the Federal Reserve building; an Embassy Suites in the upper floors of the Oliver Building; and the new Hilton Garden Inn in Gardens at Market Square.

Sam Spatter is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7843 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.