ShareThis Page
Soldiers of Army Company M reunite every year to reflect on mission, life |

Soldiers of Army Company M reunite every year to reflect on mission, life

Chris Togneri
| Saturday, September 17, 2016 9:00 p.m
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
The soldiers remaining from Army Company M, out of Unity Township stand in together in the backyard of Bill Dick in Latrobe, Sept. 11, 2016. The soldiers have been getting together every year for the last decade. The group's dwindling numbers might make 2016. the last year for their reunion. Shown left to right is Bill Dick, 85, of Latrobe, Edwin Long, 84, of Latrobe, Paul Smith, 87, of Peanut, Ken Fulcomer, 97 (seated), Liggoniere, Tom Watkins, 84, of Ligonier, Dom Eumar, 86 of Loyalhanna, Dave Newingham, 85, of Latrobe, Jim Claycomb, 85, of Latrobe and John Hauser, 87, of Latrobe.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Army Company M, out of Unity Township is shown, Sept. 5, 1950, the day they were federalized at Camp Atterbury outside Indianapolis.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Dave Newingham, 85, of Latrobe looks at a photo of Army Company M, out of Unity Township shown, Sept. 5, 1950, the day they were federalized at Camp Atterbury outside Indianapolis, at a reunion for the soldiers in Latrobe, Sept. 11, 2016.

They brought out the old black-and-white photos again.

As they do every year.

One was taken in 1950.

It shows nearly 100 young men, dressed in fresh military garb, some smiling, some stern. New recruits ready to board a train.

“I wasn’t nervous,” Bill Dick says. “Young fellas don’t hardly get nervous like that. It’s the old people that get nervous.”

Dick is 85.

Every year, he summons the men from that photo — the men of Army Company M, 110th Infantry Regiment of the 28th Division — to his rural Latrobe home for a reunion.

And every year, the number of attendees shrinks.

“We lost two this year,” Dick says. “We’re all getting pretty old. We have a lot of ailments. It’s hard to get everybody together.”

Two of the remaining have Alzheimer’s disease, and one of them couldn’t make it this year. The other did, and he seemed to be having a good day, Dick says, and that was a good thing.

There are no planned activities. They greet each other, sit down and talk.

They talk about the time Dick fell asleep on that train, headed for Camp Atterbury in Indiana, and how the men he had known since he was a boy stuffed his pockets full of ice.

“I woke up all wet,” Dick says, chuckling at the memory. “Oh, we had fun.”

They talk about shipping out to Germany on a peace-keeping mission. How they ran constant maneuvers, including that one time they set off on a 200-mile hike through the countryside.

They talk about the friendships they made with locals, about the escalating tensions with Soviet troops, how their company included “clowns and serious guys” and every type in between.

And they talk about that old photo from 1950.

They point at faces, most of them memories, and they wonder what happened to everyone.

“It brings back memories of when they were younger and they had their whole lives ahead of them,” says Susan Piccolo, Dick’s daughter. “When he knows it’s coming, it gives him something to look forward to.”

Unspoken at the reunions is that this year might be the last.

But they all know.

Dick has diabetes. And he says he’s “probably one of the better ones in the crew. I have no complaints.”

So he’ll plan another reunion next year.

Knowing it might not happen.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.