ShareThis Page
Suspect in Oakland hit-and-run identified, tried to turn himself in |

Suspect in Oakland hit-and-run identified, tried to turn himself in

Matthew Santoni
| Thursday, October 19, 2017 5:44 a.m

The Washington Township driver charged with striking a University of Pittsburgh student with his truck and leaving her with a broken leg Sunday night tried to turn himself in hours later, but police didn’t respond, according to charging documents.

Police said Jonathan A. Dulude, 34, was driving when he turned from DeSoto Street onto Fifth Avenue about 7 p.m. Sunday and struck a 20-year-old woman in the crosswalk. He got out of his truck, then got back in and drove toward Downtown.

The victim, a 20-year-old Pitt student, was transported to UPMC Presbyterian with a broken leg and cuts on her face.

According to the charging documents, Dulude went to a friend’s house on the South Side where he had been dog-sitting and tried to call 911 to turn himself in about 9:15 p.m. No police were dispatched “for unknown reasons,” the complaint noted.

Police, meanwhile, were able to connect witnesses’ descriptions of the driver, truck and license plate to Dulude, who had pictures on his Facebook page of himself with his truck. Washington Township police visited his home, but he hadn’t returned by then.

Dulude turned himself in at the Zone 3 station the next morning, telling officers he didn’t know why he fled the crash scene. He told police he got back into his truck “to move it off to the side of the road” but panicked and drove to his friend’s place.

Officers released Dulude and filed charges of leaving an accident involving death or bodily injury — a felony — and failing to immediately notify police of a crash, a summary offense. Court records did not show that he’d returned to custody.

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724 836 6660, or on Twitter @msantoni.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.