ShareThis Page
Teen charged in drive-by that preceded Antwon Rose shooting indicted by grand jury |

Teen charged in drive-by that preceded Antwon Rose shooting indicted by grand jury

Megan Guza
| Friday, August 24, 2018 11:42 a.m
Zaijuan Hester

A grand jury indicted Zaijuan Hester, the teenager involved in the drive-by shooting just before the deadly police shooting of Antwon Rose II.

Hester, 17, of Swissvale, is charged with attempted homicide, three counts of aggravated assault and four firearms violations, court records show.

Mike Manko, spokesman for the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office, declined to say when the indictment was handed down. Because of the indictment, there will be no preliminary hearing. All charges against Hester were held.

All further proceedings in the case will take place in the county’s Common Pleas Court. Manko on Friday said he had no information on a judge assignment or on a date for a pre-trial conference. He declined to say whether the grand jury is still active.

Hester is charged in the June 19 shooting in North Braddock that injured 22-year-old Thomas Cole Jr. Hester allegedly fired from the backseat of jitney on Kirkpatrick Avenue.

The indictment documents listed a second victim in the incident: William Ross.

The shooting happened about 8:30 p.m. Minutes later, East Pittsburgh police Officer Michael Rosfeld stopped the gold Chevy Cruze in which Rose and Hester were passengers, as it matched the description of the vehicle involved in the North Braddock shooting.

As Rosfeld ordered the driver to the ground, Rose and Hester allegedly ran from the vehicle. Rosfeld fired three shots, hitting Rose in the back, elbow and face. Hester was not struck. Rose died at the scene. Rosfeld has since been charged with homicide in the shooting.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.