ShareThis Page
Three plead guilty in 2016 Pittsburgh killing over Xanax |

Three plead guilty in 2016 Pittsburgh killing over Xanax

Megan Guza
| Monday, May 8, 2017 4:54 p.m

Three people pleaded guilty Monday to their roles in the kidnapping and killing of a man in Pittsburgh’s Beltzhoover neighborhood last year.

Saevon Scott-Ponder was found dead in a wooded area near Frampton Avenue on March 24, 2016. He’d been shot 14 times.

Mitchell Brian Coles, 23, Erica Harris, 25, and Johnnie Raines, 21, all pleaded guilty to one count each of third-degree murder, kidnapping and conspiracy in front of Common Pleas Judge Anthony Mariani, according to the District Attorney’s Office.

The three went to a Mt. Washington home looking for Scott-Ponder because he owed them 100 Xanax pills. When he tried to run, one of the men chased him down and forced him into a car. His body was found later that night after police responded to a report of shots fired.

Mariani sentenced Coles to 20 to 50 years in prisons and Raines to 20 to 45 years in prison. Harris will be sentenced Aug. 2.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter at @meganguzaTrib.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.