ShareThis Page
Turtle Creek rehab property latest example of nonprofit’s reach |

Turtle Creek rehab property latest example of nonprofit’s reach

Natasha Lindstrom
| Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:09 a.m
Natasha Lindstrom
A three-bedroom home on George Street is on the market and headed back to local tax rolls after the Mon Valley Initiative nonprofit housing rehabilitation group pumped $135,000 into repairs and upgrades. The Homestead-based nonprofit aims to help communities dotting the Mon Valley combat blight and expedite revitalization.
Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald cuts the ribbon at 333 George St., accompanied by Dale Bizub, chair of the board of Mon Valley Initiative; Laura Zinski, Mon Valley Initiative CEO; Turtle Creek borough Councilwoman Connie Tinsley; Turtle Creek borough Councilman Bill Kelly; and Jane Miller, field office director for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Natasha Lindstrom
The Mon Valley Initiative, a Homestead-based nonprofit housing rehabilitation group, celebrated Wednesday the completion of renovating a fomerly bank-owned, three-bedroom house on George Street in Turtle Creek. The single-family home marks the 17th residential property the initiative has rehabbed in the borough in the past five years.
In the second, Zinat Naderi (left), real estate developer for Mon Valley Initiative, makes a point to Linda Patchel of the Turtle Creek Development Corp.; Stephanie Eson, community outreach specialist for Mon Valley Initiative; and Liz Hannold (back to camera), a financial specialist with Mon Valley Initiative.

The so-called “blue tarp” house in Turtle Creek was headed for demolition.

“It was not selling. It had a blue tarp for a roof. It seemed really dark, cramped and mildewy, and it smelled dank,” said Patrick Shattuck, real estate director for the nonprofit housing rehabilitation group Mon Valley Initiative.

The repossessed home’s owner, Wells Fargo bank, almost had given up on the aging, dilapidated property built in 1920 that needed gutting just to be liveable, with repair estimates suggesting it would be more cost-effective as a vacant lot.

“But at the same time,” said Shattuck, who scouts potential fixer-uppers in 10 former mill towns bordering the Monongahela River, “it had good bones.”

So 18 months ago, the Mon Valley Initiative snapped up the blue-tarp-topped property as a gift from the bank.

On Wednesday, Shattuck joined about a dozen fellow staffers, supporters and local dignitaries such as Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald to celebrate its complete renovation. It marks the 17th residential property the Mon Valley Initiative has refurbished within the borough in the past five years.

An investment of $1.92 million into rehabilitating those homes has generated $48,000 in additional annual property tax revenues to Allegheny County, Woodland Hills School District and the borough of Turtle Creek, the nonprofit reports.

Prior to its intervention, the other 16 houses ranged in value from $1 to $33,100. They’ve since sold at prices ranging from $67,500 up to $150,000.

“They’re (the initiative) an incredible partner,” said Jane Miller, field director for the federal Housing and Urban Development’s Pittsburgh office. “They are able to pull together funding and leverage it in ways that a private investor probably wouldn’t be able to. They have what it takes to not let a community like this fall.”

Turtle Creek joins the likes of North Braddock, Rankin, McKeesport, McKees Rocks and Monessen as a pocket of greater Pittsburgh plagued by abnormally high vacancies that exacerbate blight and thwart revitalization.

About 150 single-family homes sit empty in Turtle Creek for a 7 percent vacancy rate, according to data from Irvine, Calif.-based real estate research firm Attom Data Solutions. Experts say vacancy rates start to destabilize a community when they climb above 2 percent.

Unlike relatively stable markets such as in Cranberry and Bradford Woods, Turtle Creek was hit hard by foreclosures following the national housing bust in 2008, said Laura Zinski, CEO of the Mon Valley Initiative.

“National banks lured low-income people in with predatory lending, and people did refinancing deals they could not afford, so they would go under water,” Zinski said.

Now dubbed a “sweet bungalow,” the three-bedroom house on George Street has a new roof, bathrooms, kitchen, hardwood floors, modern plumbing and lighting, central air conditioning, red-brick fireplace and an open floor plan that lets in plenty of sunshine.

After $135,000 in repairs and upgrades, it’s back on the market at an $84,000 listing price.

The Mon Valley Initiative, which formed in 1988 and has 18 employees and a roughly $1.5 million budget, also has purchased and resold homes in areas such as Swissvale and Braddock — where it recently renovated the former Free Press Building as modern commercial space topped with apartment units. Government funding makes up close to 60 percent of its operational funding, about 20 percent of which goes toward housing counseling to help inexperienced homebuyers navigate the purchasing process.

The initiative’s rehabbed homes are reserved for households whose annual income does not exceed 80 percent of the area median income, or $39,900 for one person and $56,960 for a family of four.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8514 or

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.