ShareThis Page
White Oak firefighter charged with raping 13-year-old |

White Oak firefighter charged with raping 13-year-old

Jacob Tierney
| Monday, July 2, 2018 6:39 a.m
Justin Vidra

A firefighter accused of raping a 13-year-old has been fired by White Oak Volunteer Fire Company No. 1, according to Tribune-Review news partner WPXI-TV.

Justin Vidra, 32, was charged Friday by Allegheny County police with rape, statutory sexual assault, unlawful contact with a minor and related charges, court records show.

Vidra allegedly sexually assaulted a girl many times over the course of about a year, according to a criminal complaint.

The complaint said Vidra threatened to take away everything the girl’s family owned if she told anyone, the complaint said.

White Oak Volunteer Fire Company No. 1 President James Booth told WPXI in a statement the charges were “very disturbing.”

Vidra was already being disciplined for an unspecified social media policy violation, Booth told WPXI. He was terminated as soon as fire company officials learned about the charges.

Vidra is in Allegheny County Jail on $50,000 cash bail.

He is scheduled to appear for a preliminary hearing before District Judge Thomas Miller on July 9.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at, 724-836-6646 or via Twitter @Soolseem.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.