Pittsburgh among plaintiffs accusing state of approving unconstitutional law for NRA |

Pittsburgh among plaintiffs accusing state of approving unconstitutional law for NRA

Pittsburgh is defending its local gun laws by suing Pennsylvania over a newly passed state law that the city contends could open it up to lawsuits from the National Rifle Association.

The city joins Philadelphia, Lancaster and five Democratic state lawmakers in the suit filed Monday in Commonwealth Court. The law, which Gov. Tom Corbett signed Nov. 6, broadens who can sue cities over gun ordinances that are tougher than state law, including gun membership organizations.

The suit alleges cities “will be forced to defend lawsuits brought under an unconstitutional statute.”

The plaintiffs claim the law violates the state Constitution’s “single subject” and “original purpose” clauses because lawmakers added gun law language into House Bill 80, initially drafted to establish a law specifically covering wire or copper theft.

“This legislation is not only unconstitutional but designed to bully cities like Pittsburgh trying to stop the flow of illegal guns into their neighborhoods,” Mayor Bill Peduto said in a statement.

Pittsburgh’s ordinance requires gun owners to report lost or stolen firearms within 24 hours. Penalties include a fine up to $500, or up to $1,000 and up to 90 days in jail for a second offense. The state has no mandatory reporting requirement.

The NRA in 2009 sued Pittsburgh over its ordinance, but courts dismissed the suit based on standing. The NRA did not respond to a request for comment.

In 2009, when suing Pittsburgh, the organization said the city ordinance violates state law and that local governments were “infringing upon the rights of law-abiding gun owners.”

Peduto said Pittsburgh “will not be bullied, and we won’t stand idly by when the gun lobby is given special rights over citizens seeing blood running in their streets.”

Lancaster and Philadelphia have lost or stolen firearm reporting laws, as do more than 25 municipalities statewide, according to CeaseFirePA, an anti-gun-violence organization. In addition, Philadelphia has a law banning firearms on city property among its gun laws.

Josh Maus, spokesman for the state Office of General Counsel, said the state’s attorneys had yet to review the filing.

Jay Pagni, Corbett’s spokesman, said the state Supreme Court ruled in the past that local ordinances can’t supersede state law.

“That’s why the governor has supported this bill that gives persons and organizations standing to address any type of legal proceeding with a locality,” Pagni said.

Melissa Daniels is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8511 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.