ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh, anti-war protesters agree to get along |

Pittsburgh, anti-war protesters agree to get along

| Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:00 a.m

Lawyers for Pittsburgh and anti-war protesters agreed today to establish sidewalk zones where the month-long demonstrators can sit, sleep and demonstrate without getting more criminal citations.

Since Sept. 1, the Pittsburgh Organizing Group has been protesting nearly around the clock outside an Oakland military recruiting office on Forbes Avenue. They sued the city in federal court Tuesday claiming police have been unduly arresting and hassling them. A hearing for a temporary restraining order scheduled for this morning was not held, because the city and American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the protesters, reached “an agreement in principle.”

“We see today as an absolute victory on all accounts. We have our right to protest and get out our message,” said protester Patrick Young. “It’s disappointing we had to go to federal court to affirm these rights.”

The agreement gives the protesters space on two 16-by-5-foot strips of sidewalk on either side of the recruiting office through the end of the month and still allows pedestrians to use the sidewalk without obstructions. In an area next to the road, protesters will be allowed to sit. In the second area, they will be allowed to sit, sleep and keep their belongings.

The agreement covers only the Pittsburgh Organizing Group’s protest, and the lawsuit may continue to settle issues regarding protesters’ rights on sidewalks, said Witold Walczak, ACLU’s legal director.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.