ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh-area home sales jump in January |

Pittsburgh-area home sales jump in January

| Monday, February 21, 2011 12:00 a.m

Sales of new and existing homes jumped 8.2 percent in January over the same month last year, indicating a stronger housing market in the region for 2011, according to a new report.

There were 1,474 home sales last month compared to 1,362 a year ago, according to RealStats, a South Side-based company that tracks housing activity in Allegheny, Beaver, Butler, Washington and Westmoreland counties.

“The year-over-year jump is significant because a homebuyer tax credit was in effect one year ago and is not now,” said Daniel A. Murrer, RealStats vice president.

With one more business day last month compared to January 2010, the increase was closer to 3 percent, still a healthy sign, Murrer said.

There was a 58.1 percent increase in the sale of newly built houses — 147 last month compared to 93 — while existing house sales were up 4.6 percent, with 1,327 last month vs. 1,269 a year ago.

Average home price also was up, $148,148, compared to $147,496 last January, an increase of 0.4 percent.

Median price was up 8.5 percent, at $115,000 compared to $106,000. The median price is the point at which half the homes sold for more and half for less.

NVR Inc., the parent of Ryan Homes, paced the January new construction market with 43 sales, followed by Heartland Homes Inc. with 24. Solara Ventures 4 LLC, with sales at its Otto Milk condominium complex in the Strip District, tied Maronda Homes Inc. for third both with 17.

In January 2010, NVR had 26 sales, with Heartland Homes at 23.

RealStats’ figures are based on recorded sales of homes, townhomes, and duplexes, with a price of $10,000 or higher.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.