Pittsburgh City Council members air doubts about land bank legislation |

Pittsburgh City Council members air doubts about land bank legislation

A letter that four Pittsburgh City Council members sent to thousands of residents called a colleague’s land bank proposal “predatory” and promoted a meeting set for Tuesday to discuss potential alternatives.

R. Daniel Lavelle of the Hill District, Darlene Harris of Spring Garden, Theresa Kail-Smith of Westwood and Ricky Burgess of North Point Breeze signed the letter, dated March 18. It went to residents of their council districts, who number 30,000, according to Burgess’ office.

A proposal by Councilwoman Deb Gross of Highland Park would establish a land bank as a way to transfer vacant city-owned or tax-delinquent properties to homebuyers and developers.

“Those outside of our community want to create what could be a predatory land bank that will seize all vacant, abandoned and tax-delinquent properties,” wrote the council members. They said the land bank would mean more than 27,000 city properties could be taken without community participation or benefit.

According to the proposal, a board of directors would oversee the land bank, acquire properties through foreclosure sales and an expedited title process, and then resell them. Gross said she and Councilman Corey O’Connor of Squirrel Hill are drafting amendments based on five weeks of community meetings.

“Moving forward, it is important to the future of our neighborhoods that the discussion focus on uniting communities, opening dialogue between each other and working together to structure the land bank as a transparent tool for neighborhoods to use to drive development from the ground up, block by block,” Gross said.

Potential amendments include a public petition process and more council oversight of rules and procedures. Council would have to approve land bank purchases of city-owned property.

Burgess and Lavelle have amendments they plan to present at Tuesday’s meeting. Burgess said they focus on community participation, protection and benefits. He said in its current form, the land bank, starting its operation with no money, could cherry-pick the most valuable properties.

“At the minimum, council must maintain its oversight role,” he said. “Only elected officials are truly accountable to the community.”

Mayor Bill Peduto, speaking at an economic development event, said he understood some of the concerns.

“Of course there’s going to be trepidation anytime the government says we have a policy that involves land,” he said. “You make sure that the concerns of the community are not only heard, but are being addressed.”

Melissa Daniels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-8511 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.