ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh contractor faces suit from state attorney general |

Pittsburgh contractor faces suit from state attorney general

The Associated Press
| Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:00 p.m

The state attorney general’s office said today that a consumer protection lawsuit has been filed against William R. Lacek, a Pittsburgh area contractor with a history of accepting pay for home improvement projects that never were completed or were done in a shoddy manner.

Attorney General Tom Corbett said the lawsuit was filed in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court against Lacek, of 244 Denny Park Road. He ran his business under several names: Bill-Tom-Joe Senior Carpenters, Mike-Bill-Tom as Senior Carpenters or Mike-Bill-Joe as Senior Carpenters, Corbett said.

“Using hand-delivered fliers, Lacek targeted homeowners throughout Allegheny County, including a large number of senior citizens, promising expert remodeling work at discount prices,” Corbett said.

Lacek also is accused of using misleading advertisements, failing to tell consumers that they can cancel a contract within three days and failing to register with the attorney general’s office. Building contractors are required to register with Corbett’s office under a new law that took effect July 1.

Corbett said his office received 47 complaints about Lacek and his Senior Carpenters business, and he also faces private lawsuits and criminal charges in Allegheny County.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.