ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Female Athlete of the Week |

Pittsburgh Female Athlete of the Week

Olivia DiNucci

School: Shaler

Class: Senior

Sport: Basketball

Notable: Olivia DiNucci scored 22 points in a 60-50 loss to Hopewell and 30 in a 61-58 victory over Blackhawk in the Mt. Lebanon Tournament on Dec. 29 and 30. DiNucci led the Titans with a 30-point performance in a 62-42 rout at Latrobe on Friday. “It makes it more enjoyable when I score a lot of points and we win,” DiNuccis said. “If I’m scoring a lot of points and we don’t win the game, (the points) don’t matter. But when I help my team win, that’s what’s most enjoyable.”

Have you decided where you want to attend college?

I really have not. I’m really undecided of what I want to study and if I’m going to play basketball. I want to, though. I’m

pretty picky, and I want to make sure I like the school, too.

What has been your most memorable moment of your high school career?

I would probably say my sophomore year we beat Oakland Catholic in the playoffs. We weren’t expected to win, and we were the underdogs. It was a good feeling because we knew we could do it, and we proved everyone wrong.

Do you play any other sports besides basketball?

I throw the javelin for the track and field team. I have the second-longest throw in school history. I want to say my farthest throw is 118 (feet). The record is 121.

Have you thought about what it’s going to take for you to break the school record?

To succeed in basketball or track and field and anything else, you have to prepare. You have to lift, work on accuracy and footwork. It’s pretty similar with basketball. There’s more technique throwing the javelin.

What is one thing people may not know about you?

I’m the president of student government.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.