ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh, G-20 protesters going back to mediation |

Pittsburgh, G-20 protesters going back to mediation

Brian Bowling
| Tuesday, June 5, 2012 4:58 p.m

Lawyers for Pittsburgh and a group of people arrested during the 2009 G-20 economic summit are headed back to mediation, at their own request. U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer today scheduled the mediation to run from July 9 to Aug. 9. Protesters arrested during the summit claim that city police violated their constitutional rights. Twelve of the 25 original plaintiffs either accepted settlement offers from the city or dropped out of the case. City Solicitor Dan Regan said both sides requested the mediation because they’ve finished exchanging evidence, which is part of the pre-trial process, and thought it made sense to try to settle the case. Vic Walczak, state legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union, which is representing the protesters, said the case is at the point where the next step otherwise would be a long and costly trial.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.