ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances |

Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances

| Friday, June 22, 2007 12:00 a.m

On the “Watch List”:

  • Pittsburgh’s pensions are in crisis. New numbers show the city’s plans are only between 40 percent and 45 percent funded. Stated another way, they are between 55 percent and 60 percent unfunded. Taxpayers will, somehow, have to make up the difference. But more must be done to the pensions than just a bailout. The city must evolve these pensions from defined-benefit plans into defined-contribution plans, as has been happening in the real world for decades.

  • Another weekend, another Parkway East shutdown for construction. This weekend it will be the inbound lanes that will close beginning tonight at 8 o’clock and until 5 a.m. Monday. Massive traffic jams did not materialize in the last weekend closure of the outbound lanes. But that’s thanks in large part to plenty of advance warnings and motorists avoiding the area. Consider yourselves warned again — avoid the Parkway East inbound and save yourself some grief.

Lance: To Gov. Ed Rendell. He’s nominated District Magistrate Cathleen Bubash to fill a vacant seat on Allegheny County Common Pleas Court. As we noted in May, her bench temperament can be unprofessional and her overly aggressive — and successful — primary campaign for a bench nomination was unbecoming. The state Senate should reject Rendell’s Bubash nomination.

Lance: To Shakita Mangham and Furaha Love. As suspected, there was no baby sitter at Ms. Mangham’s Larimer home when fire broke out in the wee hours of June 12. Police say Mangham lied. Three of her own small children died; two children of her friend, Ms. Love, also perished. The mothers were “out” for the evening. Such neglect cannot be tolerated. The district attorney has filed manslaughter and endangerment charges against the pair. Sadly, such charges are most appropriate.

Lance: To the North Shore casino debate. What a shame that the North Shore neighbors of the coming Majestic Star slots casino can’t solve their disagreements without rattling the saber of prolonged court battles. The latest issue: The Carnegie Science Center says it will seek state Supreme Court relief if it can’t get in writing a promise of a traffic light it deems critical to its smooth operations. There’s a word for this — overkill. It’s time to invoke Fred Rogers’ legacy of good neighbors.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.