ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh male athlete of the week |

Pittsburgh male athlete of the week

| Wednesday, May 9, 2007 12:00 a.m

Chris Wolfe

School : Baldwin

Class : Senior

Sport : Track

Notable : Wolfe won four first-place medals at the Baldwin Invitational on Friday.

He won the 400 meters (49.79 seconds) and the 800 (1:55.05). He also was on Baldwin ‘s 1,600 and 3,200 relay teams that took first. The 3,200 relay squad set a meet record with a time of 7:50.8 seconds.

Wolfe accomplished a personal goal when he was named the Most Valuable Athlete.

“I knew going in there, I wanted to win (Most Valuable Athlete),” Wolfe said. “In front of my friends and family, it was really exciting to do it and give them a show.”

The Baldwin Invitational, which was comprised of 79 boys and 78 girls teams, is one of the biggest meets in the state.

The size of the competition made for a long day, and Wolfe was tired by the time he anchored the 1,600 relay — his last event. He was going against Erie McDowell’s Aaron Fitzpatrick, who Wolfe hadn’t defeated in any event this season until Friday.

“When I ran (the 1,600 relay), my legs weren’t feeling that great,” Wolfe said. “I was surprised I had anything left in me to finish those races.”

Wolfe has accepted a scholarship to run track at Louisville next year.

Ed Phillipps

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.