Archive

ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh plans missing link in riverfront trail | TribLIVE.com
News

Pittsburgh plans missing link in riverfront trail

The Associated Press
| Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:00 p.m

A city-county authority has plans for an $8.5 million riverfront park in Pittsburgh. The plan is being described as the “missing link” to a continuous recreation trail along the southern shore of the Allegheny River.

Currently, the trail is interrupted by a gap that runs roughly from the city’s Strip District, an open-air market place during the day that’s also home to several night clubs and restaurants, to Point State Park.

The park would extend the trail through that area and include a platform that would extend about 25 feet into the water where boats could dock. The Sports & Exhibition Authority has most of the funds for the park, but still needs about $2.3 million.

The area is now a mostly inaccessible concrete shoreline.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.