ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh police officer shoots robbery suspect on South Side |

Pittsburgh police officer shoots robbery suspect on South Side

Michael Hasch
| Monday, June 7, 2010 12:00 p.m

A suspected bank robber was shot this evening by a city policeman after a brief chase that ended on a dead-end street in the South Side.

The shooting occurred shortly before 7:30 p.m. in the 2800 block of Jane Street when a police officer radioed emergency dispatchers, saying that he shot the suspect after the man tried to run over his partner with a car.

Pittsburgh police did not immediately release details of the shooting, but Cmdr. Thomas Stangrecki said the man was shot in the shoulder and that his wound does not appear to be life-threatening.

Several officers identified the wounded man as a suspect in a bank robbery earlier in the day in Penn Hills.

The shooting startled a number of residents who were sitting outside their homes in the normally quiet neighborhood.

“I saw a car driving by real fast and a police van chasing it,” said Marianne Holohan, 28. “Then I heard a series of gunshots…about seven, more than just a few.”

Lisa Bobyn, 36, and Kendra Keiffer, 35, were sitting with several children when they saw police pull the motorist over at the corner of South 27th and Jane streets.

“We saw the cop van pull the red car over and then heard a cop say, ‘Hey! Stop!’ and the red car sped down the street toward the dead end. Then we heard about six shots fired,” Bobyn said.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.