ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Public Schools driver fired after leaving 8-year-old on van |

Pittsburgh Public Schools driver fired after leaving 8-year-old on van

| Thursday, December 17, 2009 12:00 a.m

A driver for the Pittsburgh Public Schools has been fired after she left behind an 8-year-old girl who fell asleep and missed her bus stop, authorities said.

The unidentified Greenfield K-8 second-grader was found asleep in a rear seat by an A-1 Transit worker when the school van returned to the Lawrenceville garage Tuesday afternoon after finishing a route for an after-school program, school district spokeswoman Ebony Pugh said.

The driver left without checking each seat for children, violating company policy, which requires two checks of each vehicle, said an A-1 Transit manager, who declined to give her name.

The school district notified A-1 Transit about the missing girl about the same time the worker found her, Pugh said.

Pugh said the driver is being held responsible.

“This was a driver error,” Pugh said.

A-1 Transit refused to identify the driver but confirmed that she was fired.

Pugh said school police planned to charge the driver with endangering the welfare of a child.

It’s the second time in three months a city schools student was left on a school vehicle after falling asleep.

In October, a 5-year-old Fulton Elementary student fell asleep on a school bus on his way to school. The bus driver, Carlos Torres, failed to check the seats before parking the bus in front of his North Side home and walking away. The student, Timothy Bottoms Jr., awoke and was able to pry open the bus doors and knock on the doors of nearby homes for help.

Torres was charged with child endangerment by school police and was suspended from his job with W.L. Roenick Excavating & Transportation in Cheswick.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.