Pittsburgh school board drops contract with Teach for America |

Pittsburgh school board drops contract with Teach for America

A new city school board gave Teach for America the boot before its recruits had a chance to set foot in a Pittsburgh school. But the board gave a reprieve to Woolslair School, a building recommended for closure.

“I really don’t see Teach for America as a program to help us,” said new Pittsburgh Public Schools board member Sylvia Wilson, a former teacher and former official with the Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers.

By a 6-2 vote with one abstention, the board Wednesday night rescinded a $750,000 contract with Teach for America to hire up to 30 recruits a year for three years. Board President Thomas Sumpter and Mark Brentley Sr., Cynthia Falls, Regina Holley, Carolyn Klug and Wilson voted to rescind last month’s vote approving the contract. Sherry Hazuda and William Isler voted again in support of the group, and Terry Kennedy astained.

Teach for America, a nonprofit group based in New York City, trains and develops college graduates and professionals to teach for two years in high-need cities and rural areas. The group’s staff would have taught such subjects as middle and high school math, science, socials studies and foreign languages.

Kennedy said she had checked with other districts that use Teach for America. “I did not hear favorable things,” she said.

The board voted 8-1 to rescind last month’s vote to schedule a hearing on closing Woolslair School in the Bloomfield-Lawrenceville area, The move essentially saves Woolslair,

The board approved an operating budget of more than $529.1 million.

Bill Zlatos is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at [email protected] or 412-320-7828.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.