ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority counts on $1 million in savings |

Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority counts on $1 million in savings

| Friday, August 12, 2011 12:00 p.m

The Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority expects to save around $1.4 million over two years through contracts approved Thursday with banks to guarantee payment of controversial variable-rate bonds, an authority official said.

The savings will come in the form of reduced fees from the Bank of America and PNC Bank, which will offer letters of credit insuring bonds totaling about $145.5 million,said Stephen T. Simcic, the authority’s director of finance and business. Simcic said the cost of guaranteeing the bonds has dropped, and the authority expects to save around $720,000 per year over the next two years.

The $145.5 million represents only a portion of the authority’s total debt, estimated at $665 million, about 55 percent of which accounts for variable-rate bonds, Simcic said. He estimated the authority would pay $350,000 to $400,000 this year for banks to back all of its variable-rate bonds.

The move will not impact rates paid by customers, said Scott Kunka, the authority’s board treasurer and the city’s director of finance.

“There won’t be a lowering of rates, but it does help the authority quite a bit in not having to raise rates,” Kunka said.

Councilman Patrick Dowd has been critical for years of the complicated bond deal, which Kunka said resulted in the authority paying $4 million to $5 million more than expected in fees over several years. Dowd on Thursday again criticized the bond structure, saying it is as complicated as reading “19th century German anthropological journals.”

Dowd characterized the bonds as extremely risky and said money for debt fees, and time expended by the board in deciphering the authority’s financial system, would be better spent on improving the authority’s infrastructure. He urged the board to move its variable-rate debt to fixed-rate bonds.

Kunka, however, said it would cost the authority at least $50 million to do that. He said the authority’s debt structure is stable and fees are dropping.

“The structure of the bonds still works,” Kunka said, adding that the board would consider fixed-rate bonds when interest rates drop. “It’s just the cost of credit, and our costs of maintaining this credit was less this year than it was last year. There’s an element of risk involved no matter what you do.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.