ShareThis Page
Playground fire may have been intentional |

Playground fire may have been intentional

Jill King Greenwood And Jeremy Boren
| Tuesday, November 1, 2005 12:00 p.m

Vandals who unsuccessfully tried to set fire to a Lincoln Place playground over the weekend apparently came back Halloween night and tried again, causing about $40,000 in damage to the McBride Park playground.

The rubber mat flooring of the playground on McBride Avenue was charred in several places, and slides and other play equipment were burned, police said.

Someone noticed a fire burning at the park just after 8 p.m. Monday, said Zone 4 police Lt. Scott Schubert. On Sunday, a fire was set at the playground just before a neighborhood resident saw a group of kids running from the area, Schubert said. That fire was quickly put out with a fire extinguisher.

Pittsburgh arson detectives are investigating the incident.

“It’s a shame that someone would do this,” Schubert said. “This kind of thing causes a lot of grief to the community and the city, and it has a big impact. It’s a safe place for kids and families to play.”

Repairs likely will be completed in early 2006, said Mike Gable, deputy public works director. Until then, much of the playground will be unusable to area children and their parents.

The loss of the playground is the second blow the community has suffered in recent months. The city decided not to open McBride Pool in Lincoln Place this summer due to budget cuts.

“I am extremely disappointed that some fool would take it upon themselves to go out and destroy a playground,” said city Councilman Doug Shields, D-Squirrel Hill, who represents Council District 5, which includes Lincoln Place. “It’s an insult to the community.”

Shields said he wants those responsible to make full restitution to the city for the cost of repairs.

Anyone with information may call Pittsburgh arson detectives at 412-323-7800.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.