ShareThis Page
Pleasant Hills district judge returns today |

Pleasant Hills district judge returns today

| Tuesday, November 1, 2005 12:00 a.m

Pleasant Hills District Judge Mary Grace Boyle, the target of a state investigation, is expected to return to her office today after a still-unexplained 30-day leave.

But she won’t start hearing cases again until she gets her office in order.

Under investigation for allegedly using her office for campaign work, Boyle met Monday with Allegheny County Common Pleas President Judge Joseph M. James to discuss a “breakdown of the administrative function” of her court.

“We discovered some procedural problems that need to be addressed,” said district court administrator Raymond Billotte. “The whole goal is, get the backlog of work resolved as quickly as possible.”

Billotte described the problems as clerical. Boyle had been holding hearings and making decisions on cases, but wasn’t entering information on many cases into court computers that track the cases, Billotte said.

Some cases that should have been closed because defendants couldn’t be found were left open with no resolution. Billotte could not provide an exact figure of how many cases were in clerical disarray, but said there were “a lot of open-ended cases.”

The problems were discovered when Nancy Galvach, who oversees district judge offices for Billotte, visited Boyle’s office to check on operations while Boyle was on extended vacation last month.

James approved Boyle’s one-month paid leave Oct. 3 while the state Judicial Conduct Board investigates allegations that she used her office for campaign work before the May primary. Billotte declined to discuss the reason behind her vacation.

James had previously transferred two workers out of Boyle’s office because of strained relations over the state investigation.

Senior District Judge Edward Burnett has been filling in for Boyle in her absence and likely will continue hearing cases in her office.

James yesterday ordered Boyle to focus on eliminating the clerical backlog while the senior district judge hears new cases.

Billotte said James’ order is “open-ended.”

“There’s no time limit because we couldn’t determine how long it will take to take care of this,” he said.

Boyle could not be reached for comment.

Pending investigations by the Judicial Conduct Board are considered confidential. No formal charges have been filed with the Court of Judicial Discipline, which can impose sanctions ranging from a reprimand to removal from office.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.