ShareThis Page
Plotter in hotel raid ID’d, killed |

Plotter in hotel raid ID’d, killed

| Friday, July 1, 2011 12:00 a.m

KABUL — The U.S.-led military coalition on Thursday blamed a notorious Pakistan-based terrorist group for this week’s spectacular assault on a hilltop Kabul hotel and said it had killed one of the group’s senior commanders, who was suspected of involvement in the attack.

The International Security Assistance Force didn’t say how it had determined that the Haqqani network was responsible for the siege Tuesday night at the Kabul Intercontinental Hotel, which left 10 civilians, two policemen and all nine assailants dead.

But it said a senior Haqqani commander, Ismail Khan, was suspected of providing material support for the assault, and that he and several other Haqqani fighters had been killed on Wednesday in a “precision airstrike,” only hours after Afghan police had retaken control of the hotel.

“The Haqqani network, in conjunction with Taliban operatives, was responsible for the Tuesday night attack on the Kabul Intercontinental Hotel which killed 12 people, including a provincial judge,” the ISAF statement said..

Meanwhile, Afghan officials announced yesterday that they’d assume security responsibilities in seven provinces and cities, including Kabul, beginning July 14.

The quick schedule for the transition — previous announcements had suggested it wouldn’t begin till later in July — seemed designed to put to rest any suggestion that Tuesday’s assault would delay the handover.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.