ShareThis Page
Plum faces a brutal schedule with a small, inexperienced team |

Plum faces a brutal schedule with a small, inexperienced team

| Sunday, August 24, 2003 12:00 a.m

Plum juggled 31 players on defense and 24 on offense on the way to a 2-8 record last season, 1-5 in the Quad South.

With an extremely tough schedule, limited size and question marks just about everywhere, things may get worse before they get better for the Mustangs.

“We had a difficult year last year,” Plum coach Bill Rometo said. “We played a lot of kids. the big thing right now is we’ve got to get some cohesiveness, get some consistency. We did not have a set unit last year and that hurt.”

Plum returns only four starters — wide receiver Kelly Fisher, defensive end Matt Kachurik, offensive tackle Mark Bentz and linebacker John Simmons. The Mustangs will spend their two weeks of preseason and non-conference games against Fox Chapel and Penn Hills filling out the rest of the starting spots.

“We have to use a ton of people in our two scrimmages and use the exhibition games to get ready for that first section game (against Franklin Regional),” Rometo said. “We have a good shot at one of the four playoff berths, but everything has to fall into place.

“This kind of year is kind of exciting. You don’t know what is going to happen with so many question marks. Everybody on the team should think they have a chance of playing. They should see that things are open.”

Fox Chapel was a playoff team last season. Penn Hills and Upper St. Clair, another non-conference opponent, are Quad-A powers. Quad South rivals Gateway and Kiski Area are also among the top teams.

“It’s a brutal schedule,” Rometo said. “Every week will be a challenge.”

Rometo favors a pro-style offense with a strong passing game. One of the two players battling for the quarterback job should know that well. The coach’s son, sophomore Gino Rometo, will compete with senior Matt Pellis to start there. Pellis could also end up at wide receiver.

“Gino is more of a quarterback,” Rometo said. “Matt is just a great all-around athlete. We might develop a package with Matt as a slash-type player. We like to be wide open, to keep the other guy guessing.”

Simmons and junior Phil Mains are the options at running back, with Kachurik moving to fullback. Fisher should catch a lot of passes as the Mustangs’ primary receiver.

Bentz provides Plum’s only real experience and size up front at 6-foot-2, 265 pounds, although the Mustangs did finish last season starting younger players on the line, including junior guard Chris Anastasio and junior tackle Joe Hadley.

Simmons, Hadley and Anastasio should also be keys on defense, competing with Zach Erdeljac for the three linebacker positions. Kucharik was an all-conference pick at defensive end as a junior. Bentz could also play defensive tackle.

Mains and Chris Glarner will play the corners with LaMark Ingram, son of local TV news broadcaster Sheldon Ingram, at safety.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.