ShareThis Page
Plum school board places business manager on leave |

Plum school board places business manager on leave

A consultant hired by the Plum school board to look at the district’s budget process recommended changes Wednesday as the board acknowledged that business manager Mark Lukacs is on paid leave.

Superintendent George Cooke declined to say why Lukacs is on leave. Sheldon Berk, who worked for 27 years as business manager in the Blackhawk School District in Beaver County, is serving as interim business manager.

Cooke declined to say how much Berk is being paid. Cooke said the board will announce Berk’s salary when he is formally approved by the board at a meeting next Wednesday. Lukacs’ salary is $85,893.

Ed Gardner, senior audit manager for Baldwin-based Case/Sabatini, an accounting and consulting firm, told board members he found the budgets for the past three years have contained contingency funds in the line item for instructional salaries.

Gardner said Lukacs told him that the practice of boosting the instructional salaries figure had gone on for 10 years prior to Lukacs doing the job.

Gardner recommended that contingency funds be placed in a budgetary reserve line item.

He also said that the board needs to vote on the transfer of funds within the budget before the transfers occur rather than after the fact.

The board hired Case/Sabatini for $3,200 after the Plum Borough Education Association discovered about $600,000 in extra money in the instructional salaries portion of this school year’s preliminary budget. The teachers’ union scrutinized the preliminary budget after school officials slashed 19 teaching positions in an attempt to balance the spending plan. The positions later were restored.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.