ShareThis Page
Plum student dreams of soaring experience |

Plum student dreams of soaring experience

| Thursday, June 3, 2010 12:00 a.m

Dom Markham has dreamed of being a pilot since he was in fifth grade.

Markham, a cadet with the Air Force Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program at Plum Senior High School, got his wish when he took the controls of a small plane through a program offered by the Civil Air Patrol, an auxiliary of the Air Force.

The patrol routinely conducts air and ground search-and-rescue missions.

“Once you feel you are in control … it is amazing,” said Markham, 16, a sophomore who got to fly one of the planes from the Allegheny County Airport in West Mifflin. “You’re defying the laws of gravity.”

The Air Force this year gave Plum’s JROTC, now in its fourth year, $3,000 to conduct the flight program.

Each cadet in the program gets an hour of flight time. About 32 have taken advantage of it so far, said Maj. Scott Kolar, one of three instructors.

Chief Master Sgt. Tim Conley said the program represents “curriculum in action” because the cadets in the classroom learn about the parts of a plane and aerodynamics.

“Being up there was awesome,” said Alex Harrington, 15, a freshman and first-year cadet who aspires to be a pilot.

Markham, who plans to attend college and later join the military, flew the small aircraft except for the takeoff and landing.

“When I told my mom about the opportunity, she said, ‘certainly.’ She knows I want to fly. And I come from a military family.”

Harrington, who hung out with a “bad crowd” as a student at Oblock Junior High School, said the JROTC program has turned his life around.

“I used to be a couch potato,” Harrington said. “Now I stay after school every day. There’s so much to do. And now I’m an honor roll student.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.