Archive

ShareThis Page
PNC hit by wage and hour lawsuit filed by current, former employees | TribLIVE.com
News

PNC hit by wage and hour lawsuit filed by current, former employees

PNC Bank violates state and federal wage laws when it comes to paying its mortgage loan officers, three former employees and one current employee claim in a proposed federal class-action lawsuit filed Friday.

The current and two of the former employees worked for PNC in Florida while the other former employee worked in Ohio. Their employment contracts require any lawsuits be filed in Pittsburgh, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit seeks to represent all mortgage loan officers who have worked in Pennsylvania during the last three years and any former mortgage loan officers who had to sign an employment contract the bank circulated after it was sued in 2011 for misclassifying them as being exempt from wage and hour laws.

A PNC spokesman couldn’t be reached for comment.

The lawsuit claims that while PNC appears to pay mortgage loan officers an annual salary of $24,000, it deducts that amount from their commissions. The bank discourages them from reporting overtime and, when they work approved overtime, also deducts the regular pay portion of that overtime, $11.54 per hour, from their commissions, the lawsuit says.

PNC also underpays overtime by not including their commissions and bonuses as part of their total wages before calculating the hourly rate that it pays time-and-a-half on, the lawsuit says.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-325-4301 or [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.