ShareThis Page
PNC tax breaks in buyout multiply |

PNC tax breaks in buyout multiply

| Thursday, January 8, 2009 12:00 a.m

PNC Financial Services Group will gain more than twice the amount in tax breaks from the purchase of rival National City Corp. than the financial giant originally estimated.

A change in Internal Revenue Service rules to encourage strong banks to acquire weak banks will allow PNC to take a $1.6 billion tax benefit this year, according to calculations by tax analyst Robert Willens.

The calculations are based on documents PNC filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The tax savings would pay for more than one-quarter of the $5.6 billion National City purchase price.

In a Nov. 19 letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission, an attorney for the law firm Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, representing PNC, said the company this year intends to charge off $4.6 billion in loan losses stemming from National City.

“Using a 35 percent tax rate, meaning each dollar of deduction saves about 35 cents in tax, the $4.6 billion would produce a tax benefit of $1.6 billion,” said the New York-based Willens, whose tax speciality is mergers and acquisitions.

Before the IRS rule change on Sept. 30, the $1.6 billion benefit would have been spread over a number of years, Willens said.

Soon after PNC’s deal to acquire National City was announced Oct. 24, Willens issued a widely publicized estimate that PNC would collect a $5 billion tax break and conceivably not pay income taxes for six years.

PNC later said the tax benefit wouldn’t be that much and Wednesday stood by a lower estimate despite the letter from its lawyer to the SEC.

“PNC continues to believe that the recent interpretation of the tax code, IRS Notice 2008-83, will result in a net present value benefit of less than $725 million,” PNC spokesman Fred Solomon said.

PNC’s attorney issued a specific tax benefit estimate because the SEC asked for it, citing “numerous press articles describing the significance of IRS Notice 2008-83.”

SEC attorney Christian Windsor asked PNC for a summary of the impact of the notice in relation to the merger, including tax benefits that would have resulted before and after the IRS’s rule change.

In the response, PNC attorney Nicholas Demmo said the change was not “a significant factor in PNC’s decision to proceed with the transaction.”

National City agreed to be acquired by PNC for $5.6 billion in stock, a deal assisted by the Treasury Department, which bought $7.7 billion in PNC’s preferred shares and warrants. The deal was completed Dec. 31.

The deal gave PNC $98 billion in National City deposits and 1,570 branches and made PNC the nation’s fifth-largest bank.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.