Poisoned long ago |

Poisoned long ago

Poisoning the well? Really, did I hear that correctly?

The GOP said President Obama would poison the well by issuing an executive order concerning immigration. The well has been poisoned since the man was sworn in!

From Day 1, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said his goal was to make Obama a one-term president. Obama was called a “socialist”; his birth status was questioned and his patriotism was questioned.

He nationalized no industries. He allowed me to buy health insurance on exchanges, which irritates conservatives to no end. But that isn’t “socialism.”

This was his entire first term and now his second term. When was this well not poisoned?

And this has been getting worse with all the “dark money” funding hate-filled politics. Remember Bill Clinton? They were trying anything they could to make him a one-termer. These guys pumping so much money into politics — that’s poison.

I see nothing to lose for President Obama by signing that executive order on immigration. The well was poisoned before, it will be poisoned tomorrow and this will end only when people start researching candidates and voting in huge numbers again.

We can’t let the oligarchs buy the U.S.A.!

Nick Balandiat

Baldwin Borough

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.