Pole vaulter opens eyes, receives feeding tube |

Pole vaulter opens eyes, receives feeding tube

Bill Beckner Jr.

Knoch freshman pole vaulter Ryan Adler opened his eyes briefly, looked around the room and clenched the hand of a therapist Tuesday morning. But he quickly went back into a deep sleep before doctors inserted a feeding tube down his throat for the first time since he arrived at Children’s Hospital nine days ago.

Adler, 15, suffered trauma to his head in a pole vaulting accident April 18 at North Allegheny High School. He stalled midway into a vault attempt and fell awkwardly onto his head and shoulder.

Doctors gradually are taking Adler off medication that put him in a coma to reduce pressure on his brain.

Gradually, he is responding.

“He’s moving his arms, so we know he’s not paralyzed,” said Dan Adler, Ryan’s father. “He’s not moving a ton, but he’s moving. He seemed agitated with the feeding tube, but that’s a good thing, too.

“They’re taking him off the medicine so he can begin to do things on his own. It’s up to Ryan now.”

The Adlers know they must be patient with the situation.

“He’s giving us signs,” said Lisa Adler, Ryan’s mother. “He’s taking tiny, little steps at a time.”

The accident has been difficult for the family, taking them out of their daily routines and draining them physically and emotionally.

A sleeping room at the hospital has become their camp ground.

But Maria Adler, Ryan’s sister, who is a junior at Knoch, showed that time is on her side, winning the 200-meter dash in Knoch’s meet against Hampton Tuesday.

She won the race in 29.1 seconds. That doesn’t seem like a lot of time, but it’s an eternity compared to the time her brother saw the hospital ceiling Tuesday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.