Police: Armed robbery at California apartment house drug-related |

Police: Armed robbery at California apartment house drug-related

An armed robbery at an off-campus apartment building was drug related, California borough police reported.

California University of Pennsylvania used its website late Monday to alert students to the incident at 348 Second St., saying:

“At approximately 9:30 p.m. Monday, an armed robbery occurred off campus at a residential apartment on Second Street in California Borough.

“The perpetrators have not been apprehended and were last seen in the area of Second and Wood streets.

“The perpetrators are described as two black males in their late teens to early twenties.

“Both are of thin build, wearing all black clothing, one with a white bandana over his face. Both suspects were armed with handguns.”

The website posting noted that university police are cooperating with the investigation by borough police.

California acting police Chief Tracy Hudak-Vitale said the suspects and victims knew each other, calling it a “drug deal gone bad.”

Hudak-Vitale said a drug supplier from Monessen, along with two other suspects, came to the apartment specifically to collect money allegedly owed for drug sales.

The suspects knocked on the door of the apartment which was occupied by three university students.

When the door was opened, the suspects took the one male into a bedroom, where he opened a safe and gave them $850 in cash and two ounces of marijuana.

Hudak-Vitale said there are conflicting reports whether one or two of the men carried handguns.

No charges have been filed yet, the chief said, adding that police are still investigating the incident.

University spokeswoman Christine Kindl declined further comment on the incident, saying she “had not been in direct touch with police this morning.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.