ShareThis Page
Police deal possible |

Police deal possible

| Wednesday, April 26, 2006 12:00 a.m

Could Carroll Township police be patrolling neighboring Fallowfield Township by the end of the summer?

That situation is under discussion. No financial figures have been exchanged, but the time to act could be limited.

Carroll Township Supervisor Tom Rapp said police Chief Paul Brand has spoken informally with Fallowfield officials.

Leaders in the two townships to eventually will meet to discuss the idea. Contracts have not been written and discussions have not been conducted about what Carroll Township would want in exchange for police coverage in Fallowfield.

“We’re willing to sit down and discuss it,” Rapp said. “We’re going to have to know what kind of coverage they want. Are they going to want 24-hour-a-day coverage and what are they willing to pay?”

Carroll Township officials also would have to decide whether to add officers to its police force, which comprises three full-time officers, including the chief, and several part-timers.

Fallowfield Township employs three full-time officers.

A decision might have to come quickly or the opportunity to change could be lost, according to Fallowfield Township Supervisor Donn Henderson said.

Fallowfield Chief Bill Ritenour will retire later this year. Although the chief has not set a date, Ritenour has suggested he could leave the force by the end of June, Henderson said.

Meeting a summer deadline is possible, township leaders believe.

“I don’t think it would be an impossibility to get something done within a couple of months,” Rapp said.

Henderson said if the townships reach an agreement, a system could be in place in August or September.

By contract, Fallowfield must keep at least three full-time officers on its force, Henderson noted. Once Ritenour retires, the supervisors would only have a limited amount of time to hire a third full-time officer or make other arrangements for police service.

Henderson said Fallowfield couldn’t require Carroll to hire any of its officers, adding, “But we would probably highly encourage them to do so.”

Rapp said the two communities might be a perfect fit for such an arrangement. They share borders in various places and are similar in many ways, including population and road mileage.

Henderson said the two have similar numbers of calls and types of calls, and they come primarily at the same times.

Carroll Township has a population of 5,615 according to 2004 U.S. Census figures. It covers 13.8 square miles.

Fallowfield Township has a population of 4,346. It covers 21.3 square miles.

Henderson said he is not concerned with the square mileage that police would have to cover in the two communities. With only three full-time officers and no part timers, there are at least six shifts per week currently not covered by Fallowfield police. The community must, at those times, rely on state police coverage.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.