Police question 6 in sell-off of Serbia’s largest steelmaker to U.S. Steel |

Police question 6 in sell-off of Serbia’s largest steelmaker to U.S. Steel

BELGRADE, Serbia-Montenegro — Police questioned six people Tuesday, including former government officials, over alleged irregularities in last year’s sell-off of Serbia’s largest steelmaker to U.S. Steel Corp.

In a statement faxed to The Associated Press, police said they launched an investigation at the request of the Belgrade district prosecutor “over suspicion of possible wrongdoing” in the privatization process of Sartid Co. and its six subsidiaries.

Sartid was purchased last year by Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel for approximately $23 million.

“We have been assured by investigators that U.S. Steel is not the target of any of these allegations,” said John Armstrong, a spokesman for the Pittsburgh-based steelmaker. “We’re an ethical company, and we’ve been an ethical company for 103 years. Everything we did over there has been above board and in compliance with Serbian laws.”

The deal envisaged that U.S. Steel invest $150 million to improve Sartid’s operating processes and $5 million for environmental and community development projects. But the deal did not include Sartid’s debts, estimated at $1.7 billion.

Sartid, located in Smederevo, about 30 miles southeast of Belgrade, has annual raw steel capacity of 2.4 million net tons and is the largest steelmaker in the country. Sartid had been operating with losses and had declared bankruptcy before it was sold to U.S. Steel.

No details were immediately available on the alleged irregularities in Sartid’s bankruptcy process and subsequent sell-off, and officials did not say whether the investigation could result in formal charges or a revision of the privatization deal.

Among those who were interrogated yesterday was Aleksandar Vlahovic, a former privatization minister, and Nemanja Kolesar, the late Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic’s former Cabinet chief. Other officials who handled the bankruptcy and privatization procedure also were questioned.

Djindjic, who was instrumental in toppling former President Slobodan Milosevic in 2000 and his extradition to the U.N. war crimes tribunal in The Hague, Netherlands, had launched market reforms in Serbia before he was assassinated in March.

Serbia’s new nationalist government, which succeeded Djindjic’s reformist Cabinet, has pledged to investigate how privatization of major companies was carried out, claiming corruption and irregularities in the process.

The Associated Press and Tribune-Review reporter David Copeland contributed to this story.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.