Police release photo of South Strabane homicide, robbery suspect |

Police release photo of South Strabane homicide, robbery suspect

Aaron Aupperlee
South Strabane Township Police Department
The man in this photo is wanted in connection with an armed robbery and homicide in South Strabane Township on June 16, 2013.

Police combed an area near Interstates 70 and 79 on Monday and asked the public’s help to find a suspect who robbed a South Strabane bank and shot and killed a man who jumped into the suspect’s car in an attempt to capture him.

The suspect, who police have not identified, killed Vincent Kelley, 46, of Washington. Kelley tried to subdue the man as he fled the Citizens Bank branch in the Strabane Square Giant Eagle. Police released a surveillance photo of the suspect, who wore a dark-colored vest, dark pants with a white stripe down the side, mask and floppy straw hat. He is about 6 feet tall with a thin build.

“We’re hoping someone might recognize the clothing and connect it to someone they know,” South Strabane police Detective Ken Torboli said. “Our goal is to get this guy off the streets as soon as possible. He’s obviously very dangerous.”

Police are searching for a white, four-door sedan but did not release a license plate number. Kelley reached for a knife he carried as he tried to stop the robber, said friend and witness Jared Cameron. Police have not confirmed whether Kelley had a knife or reached for one, but the possibility raises a question of whether the robber, if caught and charged with murder, can claim self-defense, lawyers and experts said.

“It’s an unbelievably weak one,” Downtown defense attorney Lea Bickerton said. “Even if they would try to use the stand-your-ground doctrine, you would have to be acting in a way in accordance with the law.”

A judge would likely not allow a jury to consider self-defense in this case, said Marty Hayes, the president of the Armed Citizens Legal Defense Network and an expert witness on the issue. The robber started the violence and cannot use self-defense to exonerate himself of its likely outcome, a death, Hayes said.

However, Kelley used force in an attempt to reclaim property, which the law prohibits, Wesley Oliver, director of the Criminal Justice Program at the Duquesne School of Law, wrote in an email.

That opens the possibility of a self-defense argument, but a jury likely would not consider the robber a sympathetic victim, according to Oliver.

A judge would decide whether such a defendant has a credible claim to self-defense, said Matthew Mangino, a defense attorney and former district attorney in Lawrence County. If a judge rules the robber can claim self-defense, then the prosecution must prove the killing was not self-defense.

“It’s not completely out of the realm of possibly that someone accused of a crime could claim self-defense on someone intervening as a good Samaritan,” Mangino said. He cited a similar case recently in New Mexico that ended in a hung jury on manslaughter charges for a man accused of killing another man who tried to stop a domestic dispute. “In this case, I think he has some hurdles to get over.”

Aaron Aupperlee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7986 or [email protected]. Staff Writer Margaret Harding contributed to this report.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.