ShareThis Page
Police say Delmont woman wrecked holding cell |

Police say Delmont woman wrecked holding cell

| Friday, October 23, 2009 12:00 a.m

A Delmont woman is in the Westmoreland County Prison after police say she damaged a borough holding cell.

Andrea Nicole Bloom, 22, of 106 Valley Stream, Apt. 4B, was charged Tuesday with assault by prisoner, make repairs/sells/etc. offensive weapons, disorderly conduct, false identification to law-enforcement officials and criminal mischief. She was arraigned before Murrysville District Judge Charles Conway, who set bond at $10,000.

According to the criminal complaint filed by Delmont Patrolman Charles Madden, officers responded to a verbal domestic dispute at about 4:20 a.m. Tuesday at Bloom’s apartment. She eventually was identified as being wanted on an outstanding warrant in Fayette County and was taken into custody.

When placed in the police department’s holding cell, Bloom allegedly kicked a Plexiglas barrier, breaking it. She grabbed a large piece of the Plexiglas and threatened to use it as a weapon, police said.

“She stated she was going to get her coat no matter what she had to do to get it,” Madden wrote in the complaint.

Officers pulled out their Tasers, and Bloom eventually surrendered the piece of Plexiglas, but she allegedly continued to kick the holding cell and eventually was shackled.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Tuesday before Conway.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.