ShareThis Page
Police union head calls Mayor Murphy ‘snake’ |

Police union head calls Mayor Murphy ‘snake’

The president of Pittsburgh’s police union called Mayor Tom Murphy a “snake” Tuesday for giving Pittsburgh firefighters a contract that violates the city’s spending plan and includes health care and job security benefits denied to police.

“I think the mayor is hypocritical,” said Michael R. Havens Jr., president of the Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1. During contract negotiations between the city and the police, “They sat there and told us, ‘No, this is the plan you get, there are no amendments.’ And then they turn around and amend the plan for the firefighters. It’s business as usual for the mayor and the firefighters.”

City Council approved an ordinance March 16 that amends the city’s Act 47 spending plan to allow for the firefighters contract.

Murphy spokesman Craig Kwiecinski said the mayor hadn’t received a copy of a letter written by Havens, which was distributed to the media yesterday afternoon.

Havens has complained about numerous problems plaguing Pittsburgh police during the past nine months, including understaffing in the bureau and police car shortages.

Havens said firefighters pay $15 less a month for family health care coverage, receive more reimbursement for accumulated sick time upon retirement and are not subject to the same pension benefits cuts as police, under Murphy’s contract proposals last year.

In January, Murphy appealed the terms of a police contract created through a three-person arbitration panel in December. The matter remains in litigation.

Havens also criticized Murphy for comments the mayor made in an April 1 letter in which he vowed to beat a lawsuit filed against the city by Pittsburgh’s financial oversight board, or Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority. The authority was appointed by the state to help guide the city’s long-term financial plans.

“Murphy’s sitting there saying the ICA board is wasting the taxpayers’ money for trying to challenge the firefighters contract. Now he’s wasting taxpayer money trying to appeal language in the police contract that was given to the firefighters.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.